| Boeing 747 | |
|---|---|
| Japan Airlines Boeing 747 | |
| Type | Airliner |
| Manufacturer | Boeing Commercial Airplanes |
| Designed by | Joe Sutter |
| Maiden flight | 1969-02-09[1] |
| Introduction | 1970 with Pan Am and TWA[1] |
| Status | In development (747-8) |
| Primary users | Japan Airlines (70) Air France-KLM (58) British Airways (57) Korean Air (42) |
| Produced | 1969–present |
| Number built | 1,380 as of 2006 |
| Unit cost | 747-100 $24,000,000 (1967) 747-200 $39,000,000 (1976) 747-300 $82,000,000 (1982) 747-400 $230,000,000 (2006) |
| Variants | Boeing 747SP Boeing VC-25 Boeing 747-400 Boeing 747-8 Boeing 747 LCF |
The Boeing 747, commonly nicknamed the "Jumbo Jet", is among the most recognizable jet airliners, and is among the largest passenger airliners. First flown commercially in 1970, it held the passenger capacity record for 35 years and was the first commercial wide-body aircraft.
The four-engine 747, produced by Boeing's Commercial Airplane unit, uses a double decker configuration for part of its length. A typical three-class layout accommodates 416 passengers, while a two-class layout accommodates a maximum of 524 passengers. The hump created by the upper deck has made the 747 a highly recognizable icon of air travel.
As of the end of 2006, 1380 planes have been built with 120 more on order in various 747 configurations. The latest incarnation of the aircraft will be known as the 747-8.[2]
Contents |
The 747-400, the latest version in service, flies at high-subsonic speeds of Mach 0.85 (567 mph or 913 km/h), and features an intercontinental range of 7,260 nm (8,355 mi, 13,446 km).[3] In some configurations this is sufficient to fly non-stop from New York to Hong Kong—a third of the way around the globe. In 1989, a Qantas 747-400 flew non-stop from London to Sydney, a distance of 9,720 nm (11,185 mi, 18,001 km) in 20 hours and 9 minutes, although this was a delivery flight with no passengers or freight aboard.[4]
The 747 is the second largest passenger airliner, next to the Airbus A380. The Antonov An-225 cargo transport remains the world's largest aircraft by maximum gross takeoff weight in service, while the Hughes H-4 Hercules had a larger wing-span.[5] Only one each of the latter two aircraft were produced, while the 747 and A380 are for serial production.
The 747 was born from the explosion of air travel in the 1960s. The era of commercial jet transportation, led by the enormous popularity of the Boeing 707, had revolutionized long distance travel and made possible the concept of the "global village". Boeing had already developed a study for a very large fixed-wing aircraft while bidding on a US military contract for a huge cargo plane.[6] Boeing lost the contract to Lockheed's C-5 Galaxy but came under pressure from its most loyal airline customer, Pan Am, to develop a giant passenger plane that would be over twice the size of the 707. In 1966 Boeing proposed a preliminary configuration for the airliner, to be called the 747. Pan Am ordered 25 of the initial 100 series for US$550 million, becoming its launch customer.[1][7] The original design was a full-length double-decker fuselage seating eight across (3–2–3) on the lower deck and seven across (2–3–2) on the upper deck.[8] However, concern over evacuation routes and limited cargo carrying capability caused this idea to be scrapped in favor of wider single deck, becoming the first wide-body airliner.[9]
At the time, it was widely thought that the 747 would be replaced in the future with an SST (supersonic transport) design. In a shrewd move, Boeing designed the 747 so that it could easily be adapted to carry freight. Boeing knew that if and when sales of the passenger version dried up (see below regarding the future sales of the 747), the plane could remain in production as a cargo transport. The cockpit was moved to a shortened upper deck so that a nose cone loading door could be included, thus creating the 747's distinctive "bulge". The supersonic transports, including the Concorde and Boeing's never-produced 2707, were not widely adopted, such planes being difficult to operate profitably at a time when fuel prices were soaring, and also there were difficulties of operating such aircraft due to regulations regarding flying supersonic over land.[10]
One of the principal technologies which enabled an airplane as large as the 747 to be conceived was the high-bypass turbofan engine. This promised to deliver double the power of the earlier turbojets, while consuming one third less fuel. General Electric had pioneered the concept but were fully committed to developing the engine for Lockheed's C-5 Galaxy. Pratt & Whitney were also working on the same principal, and by late 1966 Boeing, Pan-Am and Pratt & Whitney agreed that Pratt would develop a new engine, designated JT9D to power the 747. Four of these engines were mounted in pods below the 747's wings.
To appease concerns about the safety and flyability of such a massive aircraft, the 747 was designed with four redundant hydraulic systems, split control surfaces, redundant main landing gear, multiple structural redundancy, and sophisticated flaps that allowed it to use standard-length runways. The wing was swept back at an unusually high angle of 37.5 degrees, and it was chosen in order to minimize the wing span, thus allowing the 747 to use existing hangars.[9][11]
The 747 was expected to become obsolete after sales of 400 units, but it outlived many of its critics' expectations and production passed the 1,000 mark in 1993. The expected slow-down in sales of the passenger version in favour of the freighter model has only been realized in the early 2000s, around two decades later than expected.
Boeing did not have a facility large enough to assemble the giant aircraft, so it had to build a new one. The company looked at a number of sites including Walnut Creek, California and Tacoma, Washington. In the end, it decided to build the new plant some 30 miles north of Seattle on a site ajoining a military base at Paine Field near Everett, Washington, which had a 9,500 foot runway.
With the company's future riding on the success of the 747, Boeing president William M. Allen asked Malcolm T. Stamper, then head of the company's turbine division, to lead the construction of Everett and start up production of the 747. "How would you like to build an airplane — in fact, the biggest airplane in the world?" Allen asked him in 1966, according to "Legend and Legacy", a Boeing history by Robert Serling.
"Mr. Allen, the only airplane I ever built had rubber bands on it," Stamper said.
"Do you or do you not?" demanded Allen.
"I'd welcome the challenge," Mr. Stamper replied.
While developing the 747 had been a major challenge, constructing a plant in which to build it was also a huge undertaking. In order to level the 780 acre site,[1] over four million cubic yards of earth had to be moved.[12] The factory is the largest building by volume ever built.[6]
Boeing had promised to deliver the 747 to Pan Am by 1970, meaning that it had less than four years to develop, build and test the aircraft. Work progressed at such a breakneck pace that all those who worked on the development of the 747 were given the nickname "The Incredibles".[6] The massive cost of developing the 747 and building the Everett factory meant that Boeing had to borrow, and gambled its very existence on the 747's success; had the project failed, it would have taken the company along with it.[7] Initial problems with the JT9D's development forced Boeing to delay deliveries up to a year, and as a result up to 30 planes at one time were left stranded at the Everett plant, with the company on the brink of bankruptcy.[9]
The gamble paid dividends, however, and Boeing enjoyed a monopoly in the very large passenger aircraft industry for decades. In fact, the record and benchmark set by the 747 will only be surpassed, more than 35 years after its first delivery, by the A380, built by Boeing's rival, Airbus.[13]
Before the first 747 was even fully assembled, testing began on numerous components and systems. One of the most anxiously anticipated tests was the emergency evacuation. This entailed seeing how long it took for 560 volunteers to exit from a cabin mock-up using the plane's emergency chutes. The first full-scale test took two and a half minutes instead of the maximum 90 seconds mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration, and resulted in several injuries to the volunteers. Subsequent tests achieved the 90 second limit, albeit at the cost of more injuries. Most problematic was evacuation from the airplane's upper deck: instead of a slide there were an escape harness attached to a reel.[14]
Prior to the 747's first flight, Boeing built an unusual training device known as "Waddell's Wagon" (named after the 747 test pilot, Jack Waddell) which consisted of a mock-up cockpit mounted on the roof of a truck. It was intended to train pilots on how to taxi the plane from the high upper deck position.[6]
On September 30, 1968 the first 747, N7470, was rolled out of the assembly building before the world's press and representatives of the twenty-six airlines that had ordered the plane.[15] Over the following months preparations were made for the first flight which took place successfully on February 9, 1969 with test pilot Jack Waddell at the controls.[16] In spite of a minor problem with one of the flaps, the flight confirmed that the 747 handled extremely well; the plane was found to be largely immune to "dutch roll", a phenomenon that had been a major hazard to the early swept-wing jets.[17]
Later stages of the flight test program revealed some problems: flutter testing showed that the wings suffered oscillation in certain conditions. These difficulties were partly solved by reducing the stiffness of some wing components. However, a particularly severe high-speed flutter problem was only resolved by inserting depleted uranium counterweights as ballast in the outboard engine nacelles of the early 747s.[18] This measure caused some anxiety when several of these aircraft were lost, such as the 1992 crash of an El Al 747 at Amsterdam.[19]
The flight testing program was further set back when the third of the five test aircraft suffered serious damage while attempting to land at Boeing's Renton plant where it was being taken to have its test equipment removed and a cabin installed. Pilot Ralph Cokely undershot the short runway and sheared off the aircraft's landing gear.[20]
On January 15, 1970, First Lady Pat Nixon officially christened a Pan Am Boeing 747 at Washington Dulles International Airport in the presence of Pan Am chairman Najeeb Halaby. Red, white, and blue water was sprayed on the aircraft, rather than breaking a bottle of champagne. The first commercial flight involving the Boeing 747 took place on January 22, 1970 operated by Pan Am between New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and London Heathrow Airport. Pan Am added 747 service to London from Boston, Washington, and other cities during the spring and summer of 1970. Overnight, a new standard of air travel had been created and other airlines rushed to bring their own 747 jets into service. TWA, Japan Airlines, Lufthansa, BOAC, and Northwest Orient would be among the first carriers to offer 747 service on long-haul flights. American Airlines initiated 747 service between New York and Los Angeles by the summer of 1970, and in September 1970 added nonstop 747 flights between Washington and Los Angeles. Soon afterward American Airlines added 747 service from Boston to Chicago and on to Los Angeles. In addition to its foreign destinations, TWA offered 747 flights between San Francisco and New York by early 1971.
Initially, many airlines regarded the 747 with skepticism. McDonnell Douglas and Lockheed were working on wide-body three engine "tri-jets", which were smaller than the proposed 747. Many airlines believed the 747 would prove too large for an average long distance flight, investing instead in tri-jets. There were also concerns that the 747 would not be compatible with existing airport infrastructure—an issue which has resurfaced with the Airbus A380, due to its double-deck feature.[21]
Another issue raised by the airlines was fuel efficiency. A three-engine airliner generally burns less fuel per flight than a four-engine, and with airlines trying to lower costs, fuel efficiency was an important issue that would briefly return to haunt Boeing in the 1970s.
Many of the airlines' fears came to be in the 1970s. The Arab oil crisis and economic stagnation in the United States lowered the number of airline passengers and made it difficult for airlines to fill their new 747s. So American Airlines replaced coach seats on its 747s with piano bars in an attempt to attract more customers. Eventually, it relegated its 747s to cargo service and then sold them. Continental Airlines also removed its 747s from service after several years. The advent of smaller, more efficient wide bodies, starting with the trijet DC-10 and L-1011 and followed by the twinjet 767 and A300, took away much of the 747's original market, especially as airline deregulation made point-to-point international service more common. Other airlines that have removed 747s from their fleet include Air Canada, Aer Lingus, Avianca, SAS, TAP, America West, and Olympic Airways.
However, many international airlines continued to use the 747 on their busiest routes. The type remained popular among Asian airlines for short and medium-range flights between major cities: in Japan, domestic airlines continue to pack 747s to their maximum passenger capacity. Elsewhere, 747s remain popular on long-range trunk routes, such as transoceanic flights and the Kangaroo routes between Europe and Australia. The largest fleet of 747s today belongs to Japan Airlines, at approximately 78 (series -200s, -300s and 44 -400s). British Airways has the next largest fleet of 747s, comprising 56 747-400s.
Many different stretching schemes for the 747 have been proposed, but the only design to be adopted is 2005's 747-8. The 747-X program was launched in 1996 as Boeing's response to the Airbus A3XX proposal. The 747-X would have consisted of the 747-500X and 747-600X, seating up to 800 passengers. General Electric and Pratt & Whitney formed the Engine Alliance and designed the GP7200 turbofan to power the Airbus A380. This engine was rumored to also have been planned to power the 747-X. Airlines, however, would have preferred Boeing to develop an all-new design instead of an updated 747, and the plan was dropped after a few months.
After development of the Airbus A380 formally began in 2000, Boeing reexamined its 747-X studies but instead devoted its energies to the Sonic Cruiser,[22] and then later on the 787 after the Sonic Cruiser program was put on hold for an undefined period.[23] Some of the ideas developed for the 747-X were, however, used in the production of the 747-400ER.
In early 2004, Boeing rolled out tentative plans for what it called the 747 Advanced. Similar in nature to the 747-X plans, the stretched 747 Advanced uses advanced technology from the 787 to modernize the design and its systems. On November 14, 2005, Boeing announced it was launching the 747 Advanced as the 747-8.[24] Due to long delays in production of the Airbus A380, two customers cancelled their orders and several launch customers deferred delivery, or considered switching their order to the 747-8 and 777F aircraft.[25][26]
Eventually, the 747 (in all forms) may be replaced by a clean-sheet aircraft dubbed "Y3".
There are five major variants of the 747. The 747-100 was the original and launched in 1966. The 747-200 followed soon after with an order in 1968. The 747-300 was launched in 1980, and was followed in 1985 by the 747-400. Lastly, the 747-8 was launched in 2005. Several versions of each variant have been produced, and many of the early variants were in production at the same time, especially in the 1980s.
The first model of the jet, the 747-100, rolled out of the new Everett facility on 2 September 1968. The prototype, named City of Everett, first flew on February 9, 1969,[27] and on January 22, 1970 the 747-100 entered service with launch customer Pan American World Airways on the New York-London route.[28] The flight was supposed to occur on January 21, but engine overheating made the original plane unusable and it had to be substituted, creating a more than 6-hour delay to the next day.[28] The basic -100 has a range of about 4500 mi (7242 km) with full load.[29]
The very first 747-100s off the line were built with six (three per side) upper-deck windows to accommodate upstairs lounge areas. A little later, as airlines began to use the upper-deck for premium passenger seating instead of lounge space, Boeing offered a ten window upper deck as an option, and it quickly became the standard. Some -100s were even retrofitted with the new configuration.
With a MTOW of 735,000 lb compared to the 833,000 lb of the 747-200, no freighter model of this aircraft was offered directly by Boeing. However, upon airline retirement, many 747-100s have been converted to freighters over the years. Their cheap acquisition costs more than compensate for lack of carrying capacity. They are also ideal for parcels since volume is paramount to weight. A 747-100 is owned by General Electric and used as a testbed for their engines such as General Electric GEnx.
Total production was 250. Of these, 167 were 747-100, 45 were SP, 29 were SR, and 9 were 100B.
The 747-100 was later superseded by the 747-100B, which has a stronger airframe and undercarriage design.[29] This increased maximum take-off weight to 750000 lb (340194 kg). The 747-100B was only delivered to Iran Air and Saudia (now Saudi Arabian Airlines).[30]
With requests from Japanese airlines, Boeing developed the 747SR as a 'Short Range' variant of the 747-100. The SR has a lower fuel capacity, but can carry more passengers – up to 498 passengers in early versions and more than 550 passengers in later models. The 747SR has a modified body structure to accommodate the added stress accumulated from a greater number of take-offs and landings. Later on, short range versions were developed also of the -100B and the -300. The SR aircraft are primarily used on domestic flights in Japan.[31]
Two 747-100B/SRs were delivered to Japan Airlines (JAL) with a stretched upper deck to accommodate more passengers. This is known as the "SUD" (stretched upper deck) modification.
All Nippon Airways (ANA) operated 747SR on domestic Japanese routes with 455-456 seats but retired the aircraft on 10 March 2006. JAL operates its 747-100B/SR/SUD aircraft with 563 seats on domestic routes and plans for retirement in the third quarter of 2006. JAL and JALways have also been operating the -300SRs on domestic leisure routes and to other parts of Asia. With the arrival of the much more economical Boeing 777-300, the SRs are now being replaced, with just a very few still in operation.
In August 2006 a total of 38 Boeing 747-100 aircraft (all versions) were in airline service with Iran Air (1), Japan Airlines (1), Orient Thai Airlines (2), Saudi Arabian Airlines (7), Evergreen International Airlines (6), Kalitta Air (6), Polar Air Cargo (1) and United Parcel Service (7).[32]
The 747SP was a shortened version of the 747-100. It was introduced into service in 1976 with Pan AM. Apart from the upcoming 747-8 the SP is the only 747 with a modified length fuselage. It was designed to fly higher, faster, and longer than the 747-100. Boeing hoped that the abilities of the SP would compete and take orders from the Douglas DC-10 and create a niche market, however in the end only a total of 45 were built.
As of August 2006 a total of 13 Boeing 747SP aircraft were in airline service with South African Airways (1), Iran Air (3), Iraqi Airways (2), Kinshasa Airways (1), Palace Air (1), Saudi Arabian Airlines (1), Syrian Arab Airlines (2) and Transatlantic International Airlines (2).[32]
Entering service in 1971, and further improved over successive years, the 747-200 had more powerful engines and higher takeoff weights than the -100, allowing it to fly farther. Optional engine models by GE (CF6) and Rolls-Royce (RB211)were offered for the first time. A few early build -200s retained the three window configuration of the -100, but most were built with a ten window per side configuration. As on the -100, a stretched upper deck (SUD) modification was offered much later. KLM remains the only airline to retrofit their -200s with the SUD option. Today, many -200s are still in passenger operation, though in recent years retirement and conversion to freighters has accelerated.
The 747-200B is an improved version of the 747-200, with increased fuel capacity and more powerful engines. Qantas took delivery of these from 1971. It comes in a combi version as well. The -200B aircraft have a full load range of about 6,700 miles (10,700 km).
The 747-200C Convertible is essentially a passenger aircraft that can be converted to a freighter and back when needed. The seats are removable and the fuselage has a much bigger door on the maindeck for cargo entry. The -200C could be fitted with a nose door.
This type can carry both freight and passengers, but unlike the 200C, it can do so at the same time. A wall half way through the main deck, separates the cargo in the back from passengers on the front. This type carries cargo throughout the lower deck, and on half the main deck, along with roughly 200 passengers. Also known as the 747-200 Combi.
This is a freighter version of the -200 model. It could be fitted with or without the nose door. It has a 105 ton capacity and a MTOW of 833,000 lb. It entered service in 1972 with Lufthansa.
Total production was 393. Of these, 225 were 747-200, 78 were M, 73 were F, 13 were C, and 4 were military. In August 2006 a total of 239 Boeing 747-200 aircraft (all versions) were in airline service. Major operators include: Japan Airlines (13), Nippon Cargo Airlines (10), Air Atlanta Icelandic (15), Air France (9), Atlas Air (16), Kalitta Air (10), Northwest Airlines (28), Cathay Pacific Airways (7) and Southern Air (9). Some 41 other airlines operate smaller numbers of the type.[32]
Following the aborted 747-300 Trijet, Boeing explored increasing the capacity of the 747 by using fuselage plugs to stretch the entire aircraft to seat around 600 passengers, or stretching the upperdeck the entire length of the fuselage, however these plans were dropped in favor of a more simple stretch of the upper deck part way along the length of the fuselage.[33] The 747-300 name was revived for this new aircraft, which was introduced in 1980. It was the first 747 model to feature a "stretched upper deck", which was 23 ft 4 inches (7.1 m) longer than earlier variants. The -300 also had a straight staircase for the upper deck rather than the spiral, and this created more room both below and above for more seats. With minor aerodynamic changes, Boeing increased the cruise speed of the -300 to Mach 0.85 from Mach 0.84 on the -100/-200. Also, with improved fuelburn, range improved to 7,700 mi (12,392 km).
Swissair was the launch customer for the 747-300, however, the first plane was delivered to French airline UTA on March 1, 1983.[34] Boeing never launched a 747-300F as it had no operating advantage over the 747-200F. The most significant change between the 747-300 and the 747-200 was the stretched upperdeck which was useless in freighter configuration as no cargo is placed on this deck.
Despite the -300's improvements, only 81 aircraft were ordered, 56 for full passenger use, 21 M and 4 SR. One reason for its limited sales was the imminent launch of the much more advanced 747-400 in 1985 (just two years after the -300 entered service) for which most airlines were prepared to wait. Today, most of the -300 versions are still in passenger operation, mostly in south and west Asia.
The -300M had similar cargo capacity as the -200M, however with the stretched upperdeck it could carry more passengers. This proved popular in the fleet of KLM on their Africa routes that had few passengers, yet considerable air freight.
The Japanese airlines again asked for a high capacity domestic model and Boeing offered the SR. JAL operated such aircraft with over 600 seats on Okinawa-Tokyo route as well as others.
Airlines (at August 2006) operating the Boeing 747-300 include JAL/JALways (12), Saudi Arabian Airlines (9), Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) (6), Qantas (6), and Air Atlanta Icelandic (6). Some 16 other airlines operate smaller numbers of the type and a total of 72 Boeing 747-300 aircraft (all versions) were in airline service.[32]
The 747-400 was offered in several versions discussed on the main page article. It added 6 ft (1.8 m) wing tip extensions and 6 ft (1.8 m) winglets, tail fuel tanks, revised engines, an all-new interior, and an all-new glass cockpit which dispensed with the need for a flight engineer.
The passenger version first entered service in February 1989 with Northwest Airlines on the Minneapolis to Phoenix route.[35] The combi version entered service in September 1989 with KLM. The freighter version entered service in November 1993 with Cargolux. The extended range freighter (ERF) entered service in October 2002. The next month, the extended range (ER) passenger version entered service with Qantas, the only airline ever to order the passenger version of the 747-400ER. Qantas uses the aircraft on its Melbourne-Los Angeles flights, which are too long to operate using a standard 747-400.
In August 2006 a total of 627 Boeing 747-400 aircraft (all versions) were in airline service, with 46 further firm orders. Major operators include: Air China (12), Air India (12), All Nippon Airways (23), Asiana Airlines (14), Cathay Pacific (30, plus 6 on order), China Airlines (34, plus 2 on order), EVA Air (18), Japan Airlines (44), Korean Air (43), Malaysia Airlines (19), Qantas (30), Singapore Airlines (23), Singapore Airlines Cargo (15), Thai Airways International (18), Air France (21), British Airways (57), Cargolux (14, plus 2 on order), KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (25, plus 1 on order), Lufthansa (30), Virgin Atlantic Airways (13), Atlas Air (11), Northwest Airlines (16) and United Airlines (31). Some 24 airlines also operate the type, but in smaller numbers.[32]
Production of the 747-400 passenger version was officially over on March 15, 2007.[36] The last to order was China Airlines in November 2002, and the last passenger version 747-400 constructed in 2005. However, thirty six 747-400F aircraft are still yet to be delivered.[36]
Three used Boeing 747-400 passenger aircraft are to be converted into an outsize configuration, in order to ferry Boeing 787 sub-assemblies to Everett, Washington for final assembly.[37] The first 747 Large Cargo Freighter (LCF) flew for the first time, unpainted, on September 9, 2006.[38] The LCF is not a Boeing production model and will not be sold to any customers or see any airliner operation, and will be for Boeing's exclusive use.
Boeing announced a new 747 variant, the 747-8 (referred to as the 747 Advanced prior to launch) on November 14, 2005, which will use same engine and cockpit technology as the 787 (It was decided to call it the 747-8 because of the technology it will share with the 787 Dreamliner). Boeing claims that the new design will be quieter, more economical and more environmentally friendly.
The 747-8 is 251 feet long (76.4 m), and therefore would surpass the Airbus A340-600 to become the world's longest airliner once the aircraft is in service.
The passenger version, dubbed 747-8 Intercontinental or 747-8I, will be capable of carrying up to 467 passengers in a 3-class configuration and fly over 8000 nm (14816 km) at Mach 0.86 (1054 km/h). As a derivative of the already common 747-400, the 747-8 has the economic benefit of similar training and interchangeable parts. The 747-8I is also stretched to add more capacity/payload, which involved a lengthening from 232 to 251 feet (70.8 to 76.4 m).
As of March, 2007, there were a total of 24 firm orders for the Boeing 747-8I aircraft: 4 from Boeing Business Jets and 20 from Lufthansa.
The 747-8I is scheduled to enter service in 2010.
Coincident with launching the 747-8I, Boeing also announced a new freighter model, the 747-8F, which is to be a derivative to the 747-400ERF. The 747-8F is 251 feet (76.4 m) long, and provides capacity of 132 tons of cargo. To aid the loading and unloading of cargo, it features an overhead nose-door. It uses the same engines as the 747-8I and 787. Additionally, there are wing changes and a new cockpit. It is a competitor to the Airbus A380 Freighter.
As of March 2007, there was a total of 57 firm orders for the Boeing 747-8F aircraft from Atlas Air (12) Nippon Cargo Airlines (8), Cargolux (13), Emirates air cargo (10), Volga-Dnepr (5), Guggenheim Aviation Partners (4), and Korean Air (5).[32]
The 747-8F is scheduled to enter service in 2009.
Boeing has studied a number of 747 variants which have not gone beyond the drawing board.
During the 1970s, Boeing studied the development of a shorter body, three-engined 747 to compete with the Lockheed L-1011 and the McDonnell Douglas DC-10, which were both smaller than the existing 747-100/-200 and had lower trip costs than the 747SP. The 747-300 Trijet would have been bigger than either of the competing trijets, with more payload, range and passenger capacity. The center engine would have been located in the tail with an s-duct intake similar to the L-1011’s. Wind tunnel testing showed that the upper deck interfered with the airflow into the center engine, and the design was not pursued. The 747-300 designation was later used for an improved 747-200 with a stretched upper deck.
Boeing announced the 747-500X/-600X at the 1996 Farnborough Airshow[39] in an effort to offer a competitor to the Airbus A3XX. The aircraft would combine the 747's fuselage with a new 251ft (77m) span wing derived from that of the 777. Other changes included new engines similar to those being developed at the time for the A3XX, and increasing the number of tires from 2 to 4 on the nose landing gear, and from 16 to 20 on the main landing gear[40]. The 747-500X concept featured a slight stretch of the 747-400's fuselage, and would have been capable of carrying 462 passengers over ranges of up to 10,000 miles (8,700nm/16,100km), with at least 10 tons of extra payload capacity. The 747-600X concept featured a greater stretch of the 747-400's fuselage, allowing it to carry 548 passengers over ranges of up to 8,900 miles (7,700nm/14,300km). If it had been developed, the 747-600 would have been the longest commercial airliner, at 279ft (85m), which is longer than the ICAO standard 80m x 80m box for large aircraft. While studies concentrated on these two derivatives, a third was also being considered. The 747-700X would have combined the wing of the 747-600X, with a widened fuselage, allowing it to carry 650 passengers over the same range as a 747-400.
Due to the extent of modifications over the previous 747 models, in particular the new wing, the 747-500X/-600X would have cost in excess of $5 billion to develop. This proved to be prohibitive, and Boeing was unable to attract enough interest to launch the aircraft.
As Airbus progressed with its A3XX study, in 1999 Boeing again offered the market a 747 derivative as an alternative. This was a more modest proposal than the previous -500X/-600X, which would retain the 747's overall wing design, albeit with a relofted center section increasing the span to 229ft (70m)[41]. Power would have been supplied by either the Engine Alliance GP7172 or the Rolls-Royce Trent 600, which were also proposed for the 767-400ERX. A new flight deck based on the 777’s would be used. The 747X concept featured a slight stretch over the 747-400’s fuselage, allowing it to carry 430 passengers over ranges of up to 10,000 miles (8,700nm/16,100km). The 747X Stretch would be stretched to a length of 263ft (80m), allowing it to carry 500 passengers over ranges of up to 9,000 miles (7,800nm/14,500km). Both would feature an interior based on the 777’s signature architecture. In addition, a freighter model of the 747X was envisaged.
Like the predecessor, the 747X family was unable to garner enough interest to justify production, and was shelved along with the 767-400ERX in March of 2001, when Boeing announced the Sonic Cruiser concept. While the design had been less costly than the 747-500X/-600X, it was criticized for not being enough of a development on top of the existing 747-400. While the 747X did not make it beyond the drawing board, the 747-400X, which was being developed concurrently, did move into production to become the 747-400ER.
Following the termination of the 747X program, Boeing continued to study improvements which could be made to the aircraft. The 747-400XQLR (Quiet Long Range) would have featured longer range than the 747-400ER, at 7980nm (14,800km), along with improvements to improve efficiency and reduce noise.[42] Improvements studied included raked wingtips similar to those used on the 767-400ER, and a sawtooth engine nacelle for noise reduction. While the 747-400XQLR did not move to production, many features were picked up for the 747 Advanced, which has now been launched as the 747-8.
| Measurement | 747-100 | 747-200B | 747-300 | 747-400 | 747-400ER | 747-8I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cockpit Crew | Three | Two | ||||
| Seating capacity | 366 (3-class) | 416 (3-class) | 467 (3-class) | |||
| Length | 231 ft 10 in (70.6 m) | 250 ft 8 in (76.4 m) | ||||
| Wingspan | 195 ft 8 in (59.6 m) | 211 ft 5 in (64.4 m) | 224 ft 9 in (68.5 m) | |||
| Height | 63 ft 5 in (19.3 m) | 63 ft 8 in (19.4 m) | 63 ft 6 in (19.4 m) | |||
| Weight empty | 358,000 lb (162,400 kg) |
383,000 lb (174,000 kg) |
392,800 lb (178,100 kg) |
393,263 lb (178,756 kg) |
361,640 lb (164,382 kg) |
410,000 lb (185,972 kg) |
| Maximum take-off weight | 735,000 lb (333,390 kg) |
833,000 lb (377,842 kg) |
833,000 lb (377,842 kg) |
875,000 lb (396,890 kg) |
910,000 lb (412,775 kg) |
970,000 lb (439,985 kg) |
| Cruising speed | Mach 0.84 (895 km/h) |
Mach 0.85 (910 km/h) |
Mach 0.855 (913 km/h) |
|||
| Maximum speed | Mach 0.89 (1023 km/h) |
Mach 0.92 (1093 km/h) |
||||
| Takeoff run at MTOW | N/A | 10,466 ft (3,190 m) | 10,893 ft (3,320 m) | 9,902 ft (3,018 m) | N/A | |
| Range fully loaded | 5,300 nm (9,800 km) |
6,850 nm (12,700 km) |
6,700 nm (12,400 km) |
7,260 nm (13,450 km) |
7,670 nm (14,205 km) |
8,000 nm (14,815 km) |
| Max. fuel capacity | 48,445 US gal (183,380 L) |
52,410 US gal (199,158 L) | 57,285 US gal (216,840 L) |
63,705 US gal (241,140 L) |
57,285 US gal (216,840 L) |
|
| Fuel cap./range fully loaded | (18.7 L/km) | (15.7 L/km) | (16.1 L/km) | (16.1 L/km) | (17.0 L/km) | (14.6 L/km) |
| Engine models (x 4) | PW JT9D-7A GE CF6-45A2 RR RB211-524B2 |
PW JT9D-7R4G2 GE CF6-50E2 RR RB211-525D4 |
PW JT9D-7R4G2 GE CF6-80C2B1 RB211-524D4 |
PW 4062 GE CF6-80C2B5F RR RB211-524H |
PW 4062 GE CF6-80C2B5F |
GEnx-2B67 |
| Engine thrust (x 4) | 46,500 lbf PW 46,500 lbf GE 50,100 lbf RR |
54,750 lbf PW 52,500 lbf GE 53,000 lbf RR |
54,750 lbf PW 55,640 lbf GE 53,000 lbf RR |
63,300 lbf PW 62,100 lbf GE 59,500 lbf RR |
63,300 lbf PW 62,100 lbf GE |
68,000 lbf (estimated) |
The parasitic drag is given by ½ f ρair v² in which f is the product of a drag coefficient CDp and the wing area. For the 747, CDP is 0.022, and the wing area is 5500 square feet, so that f equals about 121 ft² or 11.2 m².[3]
| 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | 1994 | 1993 | 1992 | 1991 | 1990 | 1989 | 1988 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 14 | 13 | 15 | 19 | 27 | 31 | 25 | 47 | 53 | 39 | 26 | 25 | 40 | 56 | 61 | 64 | 70 | 45 | 24 |
| 1987 | 1986 | 1985 | 1984 | 1983 | 1982 | 1981 | 1980 | 1979 | 1978 | 1977 | 1976 | 1975 | 1974 | 1973 | 1972 | 1971 | 1970 | 1969 | 1968 |
| 23 | 35 | 24 | 16 | 22 | 26 | 53 | 73 | 67 | 32 | 20 | 27 | 21 | 22 | 30 | 30 | 69 | 92 | 4 | 0 |
As increasing numbers of 'classic' 747-100 and 747-200 series have been retired, some finding their way into aircraft museums. They include:
Despite all these, very few crashes have been attributed to design flaws of the 747. The Tenerife disaster was a result of pilot error, ATC error and communications failure, while Japan Airlines Flight 123 the consequence of improper aircraft repair. United Airlines Flight 811, which suffered an explosive decompression mid-flight on February 24, 1989, subsequently had NTSB issuing a recommendation to have all similar 747-200 cargo doors modified. TWA Flight 800, a 747-100 that exploded mid-air on July 17, 1996, led to the Federal Aviation Administration proposing a rule requiring the installation of an inerting system in the center fuel tank for most large aircraft.
As of May 2006, there were a total of 44 hull-loss occurrences involving 747s, with 3707 fatalities.
Production: Airbus A380-800 · Antonov An-124 Ruslan · Antonov An-225 Mriya · Boeing 747 (SP/-400/LCF) · Lockheed C-5 Galaxy
Proposed: Beriev Be-2500 · Boeing 747-8 · Boeing Pelican
Concepts/prototypes: Boeing NLA · Bristol Brabazon · Convair XC-99 · Hughes H-4 (Spruce Goose) · McDonnell Douglas MD-12
Timeline of aviation
Aircraft · Aircraft manufacturers · Aircraft engines · Aircraft engine manufacturers · Airports · Airlines
Air forces · Aircraft weapons · Missiles · Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) · Experimental aircraft
Notable military accidents and incidents · Notable airline accidents and incidents · Famous aviation-related deaths
Flight airspeed record · Flight distance record · Flight altitude record · Flight endurance record · Most produced aircraft